
Case Summary: Cole v Walsh
This dispute centred around lease covenant clause 29, which obligated the club to certain RSL-related activities. When the RSL sold the land, the club argued it was no longer bound by these obligations. However, the court determined that these obligations were personal to the RSL and did not transfer with the land, ruling in favour of the RSL and awarding $182,000 in damages. This case serves as a reminder of the complexities in property transactions and leases for both lessors and lessees.
Read More


















